Trump and Texas Win With Latest Appeals Court Decision - Sanctuary Cities Lose

Adjust Comment Print

Lawmakers and activists slammed a federal appeals court ruling allowing a hardline anti-immigration law to take effect in Texas.

The US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit overruled a judgment against a Texas law, the Senate Bill 4 (SB4), that prohibits "sanctuary city" policies in the state, a court filing revealed.

Republican Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton applauded the ruling with a statement saying "dangerous criminals shouldn't be allowed back into our communities" to possibly commit more crimes.

The court said that the plaintiffs would likely mostly lose in their challenge to the state law known as SB 4. The ruling overturned one portion of the law requiring elected officials to "endorse" the law.

Local governments can't limit inquiries about the immigration status of anyone who is lawfully detained, can't bar the sharing of immigration status with federal agencies, and can't bar cooperation with federal immigration officers.

Dion Lewis' $11.5 million in guarantees too rich for the Patriots
Butler later denied any off-field misconduct, saying he never missed a curfew or do anything to hurt the Patriots' chances. While Lewis had his moments in the sun with New England, Butler became a full-fledged star after his Super Bowl XLIX pick.

Lawyers for Texas said the law helped ensure conformity across the state on the application of immigration law and prevented localities from adopting positions of non-cooperation with federal authorities. "Unsafe criminals shouldn't be allowed back into our communities to possibly commit more crimes".

State Sen. Jose Menendez dismissed the law as "unnecessary and politically motivated" adding it was opposed by "virtually everyone in law enforcement".

The law is one of the most controversial in recent Texas history. Under SB4, law enforcement officials who fail to comply with federal immigration efforts face a Class A misdemeanor - leading to up to a year in prison and/or a $4,000 fine - and potentially a civil penalty ranging from $1,000 to up to $25,500 per day.

"The foregoing discussion demonstrates there is no merit in their [plaintiff's] remaining arguments, and none of the other challenged provisions of SB4 facially violate the Constitution", the court document said on Tuesday.

President Trump and Attorney General Jeff Sessions have made cracking down on "sanctuary cities" a key focus of the administration. Sanctuary supporters say enlisting police in deportation actions undermines community trust in local law enforcement, particularly among Latinos. "We are also pleased that the court narrowed the law in certain respects and accepted Texas' critical concession that localities are free to decline ICE requests for assistance to preserve local resources", said Lee Gelernt, deputy director of the ACLU's Immigrants' Rights Project. "Moreover, there remain options in the 5th Circuit and the Supreme Court to revisit this faulty decision as to preliminary relief".

Comments